Itta/270/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. A.p.meat Development Corporation Ltd
High Court
17 Apr 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/270/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. A.p.meat Development Corporation Ltd
Date of order
17 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/270/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. A.p.meat Development Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.270 of 2014
Date: 17-04-2014
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IHyderabad
.....Appellant
AND
A.P. Meat Development Corporation Ltd.,Hyderabad.
...Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.270 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta )
We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant andgone through the judgment and order of the learned Tribunal.
In this case, the learned Tribunal on a concurrent fact-finding has held that the liability to pay the amount to the L.I.C. hadin fact crystallized during the year under consideration and theexpenditure has been incurred by the assessee on the direction ofthe Government of Andhra Pradesh. Therefore, the genuineness ofthe expenditure cannot be doubted and in this view, it is anexpenditure though relatable to the earlier year, the same isallowable in the year under consideration and since the liability toincur the same has arisen and crystallized. We, therefore, do notfind any element of law to decide this appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
___________________
K.J.
SENGUPTA, CJ
__________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.