Case LawHigh Court › Itta/271/2013 Of Sri Mallacheruvu Veeram...

Itta/271/2013 Of Sri Mallacheruvu Veerambhotla Gupta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 12 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/271/2013 Of Sri Mallacheruvu Veerambhotla Gupta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/271/2013 Of Sri Mallacheruvu Veerambhotla Gupta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, we dismiss the appeal for the present.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI I.T.T.A. No.271 OF 2013 Between: M/s. Sri Mellacheruvu Veerambhotla Gupta ..... Appellant AND Commissioner of Income TaxGuntur .....Respondent The Court made the following : JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta) We are of the view that this matter is not requiredto be admitted for consideration, as the rectificationapplication is filed against the salf-same order. Hence, we dismiss the appeal for the present. Noorder as to costs. ______________________Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ. July 12, 2013MAS __________G.Rohini, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan