Case Law › High Court › Itta/274/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/274/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S.ocv Reinforcement Manufacturing Limited

High Court 06 Jan 2016 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

06 Jan 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Itta/274/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S.ocv Reinforcement Manufacturing Limited, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHYI.T.T.A. M.P. (SR) No.43 OF 2016 IN/AND INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.274 OF 2015 COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) An application, in I.T.T.A. M.P.(SR) No.43 of 2016 in I.T.T.A.No.274 of 2015, is filed seeking permission of this Court to withdrawI.T.T.A. No.274 of 2015 as not pressed, in terms of the Central Board ofDirect Taxes Circular No.21 of 2015. I.T.T.A No.274 of 2015 is dismissed as not pressed. I.T.T.A.M.P. (SR) No.43 of 2016 is allowed accordingly. In consequence,miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal, shall standdismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J _____________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J Date: 06-01-2016.Dsh HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY 06010215 I.T.T.A. M.P. (SR) No.43 OF 2016IN/AND INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.274 OF 2015 (Common Judgment of the Division Bench delivered byHon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) DSH --Date. 06012016

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.