Case Law › High Court › Itta/276/2008 Of B. Naganna v. Joint Com...

Itta/276/2008 Of B. Naganna v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 21 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

21 Feb 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/276/2008 Of B. Naganna v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO ITTA No. 276 of 2008Dated: 21-02-2013 Between:B.Naganna. AndJoint Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle-2,Hyderabad. …Appellant …Respondent. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOITTA No. 276 of 2008 Judgment:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) The learned counsel for the appellant/assessee has filed a letterdated 19-02-2013 stating that the appellant has instructed the counselto withdraw the appeal. The instructions are reiterated by the learnedcounsel in the Court today. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Nocosts. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 21[st] February, 2013 _______________________________M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, JGRR

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.