Itta/276/2017 Of The Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Visakhapatnam v. M/S Steel City Securities, Visakhapatnam
High Court
28 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/276/2017 Of The Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Visakhapatnam v. M/S Steel City Securities, Visakhapatnam
Date of order
28 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/276/2017 Of The Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Visakhapatnam v. M/S Steel City Securities, Visakhapatnam, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
APHC010491142017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADAT AMARAVATI [3516](Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURHANTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAYINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 276/2017
Between:
The Prl Commr Of Incom
The Prl Commr Of Income Tax-2, Visakhapatnam
AND
M/s Steel City Securities VisakhapatnamVisakhapatnam
M/s Steel City Securities VisakhapatnamVisakhapatnam
Counsel for the Appella
1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.G V N HARI
I.T.T.A.No.276 of 2017
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
28.01.2025 MDP
________________________
________________________JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.