Case LawHigh Court › Itta/277/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/277/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/Sacme Builders

High Court 11 Nov 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/277/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/Sacme Builders
Date of order
11 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/277/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/Sacme Builders, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: We, therefore, dismiss the appeal following the judgment in R.C.No.5 of1997.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No.277 of 2003 -JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order, dated06.08.2002, passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘A’ of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal in I.T.A.No.301/Hyd/98. Ms.Sammera, learned counsel for the respondent, submits that thesubject matter of this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Courtin R.C.No.5 of 1997. Learned Standing Counsel for the Department does notdispute the same. In the instant case, the Tribunal passed the order following its own orderin I.T.A.Nos.602 and 606 of 1993, which, in turn, is the subject matter ofR.C.No.5 of 1997. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal following the judgment in R.C.No.5 of1997. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed in this appeal shall also standdisposed of. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date:11.11.2014kdl _______________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan