Case Law › High Court › Itta/277/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/277/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri Rao Subba Rao (Huf)

High Court 17 Apr 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

17 Apr 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/277/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri Rao Subba Rao (Huf), the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.277 of 2014 Date: 17.04.2014 Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-IIIHyderabad .....Appellant AND Sri Rao Subba Rao (HUF)Hyderabad ...Respondent HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.277 of 2014 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) Since the connected appeal on identical issue has beendismissed by this Court previously, this appeal is also dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ __________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 17-04-2014 Gsn

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.