Case LawHigh Court › Itta/279/2013 Of Mr.kotagiri Vidyadhara...

Itta/279/2013 Of Mr.kotagiri Vidyadhara Rao v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3

High Court 16 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/279/2013 Of Mr.kotagiri Vidyadhara Rao v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3
Date of order
16 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/279/2013 Of Mr.kotagiri Vidyadhara Rao v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Granting liberty as sought [for, ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed]as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR INCOME TAX TR BU NAL APPEAL NO: 279 OF [201][ 3] Income Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of [the ][lncome Tax Ac!1961]against the order dated 28.03.201 3 in l.T.A.No.1 61 [2 ][lHYDl201 ][2 ]on [the ][file ][of ][the ][lncome]Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B' ]Hyderabad [for the ][Assessment ][Year]2008-2009. Between: I\/r. Kotagiri Vidyadhara Rao, S/o. Late Sri [K.Narayana ][Rao, Aged ][61 ][years']R/o. Plot No.63, Ashwini Layout, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT AND Assistanl Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central [Circle-3, ][Hyderabad,] ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. T BALA Counsel for the Respondent: -- The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE [SRI JUSTICE M'S.RAMACHANDRA ] AND THE HON'BLE SRI [T.VINOD ] I.T.T.A.No.279 of 2Ol3 JUDGMENT:(Per lioDble Sri Justlce M S. [I? ][lachat)dr.1 ][Raol] Counsel for appellant filed [Memo ][on ][1l-02.2O21 stating]that the appellant [wishes ][to ][opt ][for Vivad ][Se ][Viswas ][Scheme,]2O2O' and so the appellant [wishes ][to ][withdraw ][this ][Appeal]with iiberty to revive the [Appeal ][in ][the ][event ][the ][appellant]does not get satisfactory result [in ][the ][said ][Scheme.] 2. Granting liberty as sought [for, ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed]as withdrawn. No costs. 3. Consequently, misceilaneous [petitions ][pending, ][if ][any,]shall stand closed. SD/. B.S. CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The lncome Tax [Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench ]['8, ][Hyderabad] 2. One CC to Sri. T. Bala [Mohan ][Reddy, ][Advocate ] 3. Two CD CoPiesgbrk HIGH COURT DATED:1610212021 JUDGMENT ITTA.No.279 of 2013 ITTA DISMISSEDAS WITHDRAWN,, (A',..-r' olo'I [.t]orr nU {;{tt1HesTA(ool0l./lAR [2021]**c.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan