Itta/279/2013 Of Mr.kotagiri Vidyadhara Rao v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3
High Court
16 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/279/2013 Of Mr.kotagiri Vidyadhara Rao v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3
Date of order
16 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/279/2013 Of Mr.kotagiri Vidyadhara Rao v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Granting liberty as sought [for, ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed]as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
INCOME TAX TR BU NAL APPEAL NO: 279 OF [201][ 3]
Income Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of [the ][lncome Tax Ac!1961]against the order dated 28.03.201 3 in l.T.A.No.1 61 [2 ][lHYDl201 ][2 ]on [the ][file ][of ][the ][lncome]Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B' ]Hyderabad [for the ][Assessment ][Year]2008-2009.
Between:
I\/r. Kotagiri Vidyadhara Rao, S/o. Late Sri [K.Narayana ][Rao, Aged ][61 ][years']R/o. Plot No.63, Ashwini Layout, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
Assistanl Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central [Circle-3, ][Hyderabad,]
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. T BALA
Counsel for the Respondent: --
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRI JUSTICE M'S.RAMACHANDRA ]
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI [T.VINOD ]
I.T.T.A.No.279 of 2Ol3
JUDGMENT:(Per lioDble Sri Justlce M S. [I? ][lachat)dr.1 ][Raol]
Counsel for appellant filed [Memo ][on ][1l-02.2O21 stating]that the appellant [wishes ][to ][opt ][for Vivad ][Se ][Viswas ][Scheme,]2O2O' and so the appellant [wishes ][to ][withdraw ][this ][Appeal]with iiberty to revive the [Appeal ][in ][the ][event ][the ][appellant]does not get satisfactory result [in ][the ][said ][Scheme.]
2. Granting liberty as sought [for, ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed]as withdrawn. No costs.
3. Consequently, misceilaneous [petitions ][pending, ][if ][any,]shall stand closed.
SD/. B.S. CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome Tax [Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench ]['8, ][Hyderabad]
2. One CC to Sri. T. Bala [Mohan ][Reddy, ][Advocate ]
3. Two CD CoPiesgbrk
HIGH COURT
DATED:1610212021
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.279 of 2013
ITTA DISMISSEDAS WITHDRAWN,,
(A',..-r' olo'I [.t]orr nU
{;{tt1HesTA(ool0l./lAR [2021]**c.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.