In Itta/280/2012 Of Commissioner Of Incometax-Ii v. M/S Rk Hair Products Pvt Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the above submission, this appeal is dismissed in termsof the observations made therein. _____________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.280 OF 2012
Date: 16.07.2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Visakhapatnam.
….Appellant
And
M/s. R.K.Hair Products P.Ltd.,Visakhapatnam.
…Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No. 280 of 2012
ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Sri S.R.Ashok, learned senior counsel for theappellant and gone through the impugned judgment and order of thelearned Tribunal.
The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the issueinvolved in this appeal is identical to the one raised in ITANo.189/Vizag/2009, which was dismissed by this Court today.
In view of the above submission, this appeal is dismissed in termsof the observations made therein.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 16.07.2013KLP/ES
______________
G. ROHINI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue