Itta/281/2018 Of M/S. Vodafone Mobile Services Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
03 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/281/2018 Of M/S. Vodafone Mobile Services Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itta/281/2018 Of M/S. Vodafone Mobile Services Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 281 OF 2018
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome [Tax ][Act]196't against the order dated 30-05-2018 in ITA No. 41lHyd/2018 [on ][the ][file ][of]the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench - B, [Hyderabad ]in [for]assessment Year 2016-17 [preferred ]against the Order dated [30-1 ]1-2017 [on ][the]file of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, Hyderabad ITTA.No.0296/ClT(A)-BlHydl2016-17 [preferred ]against the Order dated 27-02-2Q17 [onthe]file of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome-Tax, TDS circle-2('l ), [Hyderabad.]
Between:
M/s. Vodafone Mobile Services Limited,, [(Formerly ]M/s Vodafone [South]Limited), 1-10-178, Varun Towers - ll,6th Floor, Begumpet, [Hyderabad ][- ][500]016, Telangana.
...AppellanUAppellant
AND
Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, TDS Circle [- ][2(1), ][Hyderabad, 4th]Floor, A - Block, I.T. Towers, A.C. [guards, ]Hyderabad [- ]500 004, [Telangana.]
...RespondenU ResPondent
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that [in ]the [circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the [High Court ][may ][be pleased to direct]the Respondent not to take any coercive [steps ][for ][the ][recovery ][of the ][balance]alleged demand, [pending ]disposal of the above appeal.
Cbunsel for the Appellant : Sri A V A Siva KartikeyaCounsel for the Respondent: Sri A Rama Krishan [Reddy ][representing]Sri A. Radha Krishna
The Court delivered the following: Judgment
THE HONOURABLE AND
THE HONOURABLE [I{AMAVARAPU RA"'ESHWAR RAO]I.T.T.A.[No.2][81 ][0F ][2018]
JUDG[MENT:][ (per ][Hon'ble Justice ][Sujog Paul)]
SriA.V.A.SivaKartikeya,learnedCounselfortheappellant,Sri A.Rama [Krishna ][Reddy, ][learned counsel representing ][Sri ][Radha]Krishna, [learned counsel for the respondent']
2. With the [consent, finallY heard']
3.Learnedcounselfortheappeilant'attheoulset'bypiacingreliance on [the ][judgment ][of ][Hon'ble Supreme ][Court ][in ][Bharati]Cellular Ltd., [v. ][Assistant ][Commissioner ][of ][Income ][TaxL ][submits]that singular [point ][involved ][in this ][matter is ][no ][more ][res ][integra ][and]curtains [are ][frnally ][clrawn ][by ][the ][Hon'blc ][Supreme ][Court ][in ][the ][said]case. It is [submitted ][that ][the stand of the petitioner ][was ][tl)c ][activity]in question [is ][a ][sa1e, ][whereas ][the ][responclents ][are ][treating ][it ][to ][be]'commission". [Since, ][the ][Hon'ble Supreme ][Court ][has ][dt:cided ][the]aforesaid [poin*. ][in ][favour ][of ][assessees, ][the ][impugned order ][rnay ][be ][set]aside.
4. Learned counselfor the [respondent ][fairly ][submitted ][that]singular point [above]indeed covered [by the ][recent ][ju<lgment]1nBharati Cellular [Ltd's ][case ][suPra']
5Resultantly, the [impugned order ][is ][set ][aside ][']
6. Accordingly, the Appcal is allowed. No costs. Interlocutory [..]applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed
sd/- A.v.s.s.c.s.M.MAJOINT REGISR
//TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome [Tax Appellate ][Tribunal ][Hyderabad Bench - ][B' ][Hyderabad]
2. The Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals)-B' ][Hyderabad ][[, ][.]][[.]]
[[, ][.]][[.]]5. fft" Assistant [Commissioner of ][lncome-Tax' TDS circle-2(1)' ][Hyderabad]+ On" CC [to Sri ] [Siva Kartikeya, Advocate ]+ On" CC [to Sri ] [Siva Kartikeya, Advocate ]
5. One CC [to ][Sri ][Radha Krishna, Advocate
6. Two CD [CoPies]
ADI(gh
HIGH GOURT
DATED:0310912024
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.281 of 2018
ALLOWING THE ITTAWITHOUT COSTS
g[(9d4]X6.
sd/- A.v.s.s.c.s.M.MAJOINT REGISR
//TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome [Tax Appellate ][Tribunal ][Hyderabad Bench - ][B' ][Hyderabad]
2. The Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals)-B' ][Hyderabad ][[, ][.]][[.]]
[[, ][.]][[.]]5. fft" Assistant [Commissioner of ][lncome-Tax' TDS circle-2(1)' ][Hyderabad]+ On" CC [to Sri ] [Siva Kartikeya, Advocate ]+ On" CC [to Sri ] [Siva Kartikeya, Advocate ]
5. One CC [to ][Sri ][Radha Krishna, Advocate
6. Two CD [CoPies]
ADI(gh
HIGH GOURT
DATED:0310912024
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.281 of 2018
ALLOWING THE ITTAWITHOUT COSTS
g[(9d4]X6.
IEi4/"t'l-)ct"lr [L]fr t ttrit, iI\,22x*,ai\\.\ [,/]t \""'1 --.:-, .-t tt,l * ;7<+,//-:-;-.-'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.