Case LawHigh Court › Itta/28/2003 Of Sri Rama Medical v. The...

Itta/28/2003 Of Sri Rama Medical v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 20 Aug 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/28/2003 Of Sri Rama Medical v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/28/2003 Of Sri Rama Medical v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.Nos.1, 20, 25, 27 & 28 OF 2003 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) In this batch of Income Tax Appeals field under Section 260A ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961, a common order, dated 02.08.2002, passedby the Hyderabad Bench ‘B’ of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (forshort, ‘the Tribunal’) in I.T.A.Nos.235 to 239/Hyd/2002, is challenged. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and Sri S. R. Ashok,learned counsel for the respondent. The controversy is about the disallowance of the credits, whichwere taken note of during the search operations. The appellantpleaded that the credits were, in fact, reflected in the books of accountsin the corresponding assessment years and there was no basis fordisallowing them in the block assessment. As a corollary of this, itclaimed interest on such credits. The matter pertaining to the disallowance of credits in respectof the appellant itself, that too in relation to the very search, was dealtwith by this Court in I.T.T.A.No.21 of 1999. Through order dated29.12.2011, a Division Bench of this Court took the view that oncecredits are reflected in the books of accounts in the correspondingassessment years, the same needs to be taken note of while makingthe block assessment. From this premise, it flows that the interest thathas accrued on the credits must also be taken into account. Hence, we allow the appeals and direct that the appellant isentitled to deduction of interest on such of the credits noted in searchoperations, which were reflected in the books of accounts in thecorresponding assessment years. There shall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous petitions filed in the appeals shall standdisposed of. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. ______________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J. 20.08.2014KH
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan