Itta/28/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.bommidala Enterprises (P) Ltd
High Court
20 Aug 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/28/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.bommidala Enterprises (P) Ltd
Date of order
20 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/28/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.bommidala Enterprises (P) Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
APHC010796032017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3545]
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMAINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 28/2018
Between:
1. THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUNTUR
...APPELLANT
AND
1. M/S BOMMIDALA ENTERPRISES P LTD, D.NO.8-24-53, Mangalagiri Road, GUNTURRoad, GUNTUR
...RESPONDENT
Appeal under section _______ against ordersTo set aside the order of the Income TAX Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam ITA.no.484/VIZAG/2014,DATED 07-04-2017, FOR A.Y.2010-11IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To dispense with the filing of certified copy of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal order in ITANo.271/Vizag/2012, dated-07/04/2017 and to pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone delay of 155 days in filing the ITTA and to passCounsel for the Appellant:
1.ELEVATED AS JUDGE
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.DUNDU MANMOHAN
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
&
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.28 of 2018
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
Learned counsel for the appellant has placed a copy of the certificate
issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Guntur, wherein it is stated that the appeal filed by the department in I.T.T.A.No.28 of 2018 is to be withdrawn, in view of the tax effect involved in the case is Rs.88,95,036/-, which is below monetary limits. Accordingly, learned counsel sought permission of the Court to withdraw this appeal.
2. Copy of the certificate is placed on record. Permission is granted.
3. Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date:21.08.2025 SCS
__________________________________
JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
256
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
&
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.28 of 2018
Dt.21.08.2025
SCS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.