Itta/282/2012 Of The Commissione Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S.lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd
High Court
02 Aug 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/282/2012 Of The Commissione Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S.lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd
Date of order
02 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/282/2012 Of The Commissione Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S.lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANUI.T.T.A.No.282 of 2012
Date: 02-08-2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And M/s. Lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd.,Lanco House, 141, Avenue 8,Road No.2, Banjara Hills,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A.No.282 of 2012
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
This appeal is preferred against the judgment and
order of the learned Tribunal, dated 08-01-2010 inI.T.A.No.72/H/2009 in relation to assessment year 2000-01.
2. After hearing the learned Standing counsel for IncomeTax and after going through the impugned judgment and order ofthe learned Tribunal, we are of the view that the Department shouldnot have preferred this appeal on two grounds i.e., 1) that the
amount of the tax effect in this matter is less than Rs.10,00,000/- andthat filing of this appeal is contrary to the department’s own circular;
and
2) that the impugned order is only an order of remand.
As such, no point of law is involved in this matter for adjudication.
3. The appeal is dismissed accordingly. There will be no
order as to costs.
_________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 02-08-2013YCR
_________________
K.C.BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.