In Itta/282/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax [International Taxation] v. M/S.prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.r.l, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed and theapplication is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
I.T.T.A.M.P.No.14 of 2016In/AndI.T.T.A.No.282 of 2015
COMMON ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
I.T.T.A.M.P(sr).No.44 of 2016 is filed stating that the appeal may bepermitted to be withdrawn as not pressed in terms of the Circular issued bythe Central Board of Direct Taxes i.e Circular No.21 of 2015 dated10.12.2015.
The appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed and theapplication is disposed of accordingly. The miscellaneous petitionspending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as tocosts.
_____________________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
Date: 07.01.2016JSU
___________________________________
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
JSU
I.T.T.A.M.P.No.14 of 2016In/AndI.T.T.A.No.282 of 2015
Date: 07.01.2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue