Case Law › High Court › Itta/283/2003 Of M/S.sri Rama Service St...

Itta/283/2003 Of M/S.sri Rama Service Station v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 21 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

21 Feb 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/283/2003 Of M/S.sri Rama Service Station v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOITTA No. 283 of 2003 Dated: 21-02-2013 Between:M/s Sri Rama Service Station,Krishna Dist. AndITO, Ward 2,Vijayawada. …Appellant …Respondent. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOITTA No. 283 of 2003 Judgment:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) The learned counsel for the appellant/assessee has filed a letterdated 17-10-2012 stating that the appellant has instructed the counselto withdraw the appeal. The instructions are reiterated by the learnedcounsel in the Court today. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Nocosts. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 21[st] February, 2013 _______________________________M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, JGRR/SCS

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.