Itta/284/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax-Iii v. M/S.nizam Sugars Limited
High Court
12 Nov 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/284/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax-Iii v. M/S.nizam Sugars Limited
Date of order
12 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itta/284/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax-Iii v. M/S.nizam Sugars Limited, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: Following the same, we dismiss both the appeals.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A.Nos.284 & 313 of 2003
COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.NarasimhaReddy)
These two appeals are filed by the Department feelingaggrieved by the orders in I.T.A.Nos.1866/Hyd/1996 and87/Hyd/1999, dated 12.07.2001 and 22.01.2003, respectively,passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘A’ of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal. The respondent is common in both the appeals.
It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counselfor the appellant as well as learned counsel for the respondent thatsimilar questions, that are raised in these appeals, were answeredagainst the Department by this Court through its order, dated22.07.2014 in I.T.T.A.No.6 of 2002.
Following the same, we dismiss both the appeals. Thereshall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions filed in these appeals shall alsostand disposed of.
____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
Date:12.11.2014GJ
_____________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.