Itta/284/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S Sentini Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad
High Court
20 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/284/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S Sentini Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad
Date of order
20 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/284/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S Sentini Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
l
HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE TWO THOUSAND
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE ANDTHE HONOURABLE
INCOME TAX [ NO:][ 284oF ][2010]
(lncome Tax Tribunal [Appeal under Section 260 ] [of ][the ][lncorne ][Tax ][Act'']1961 against [the order made in ][l ] [No ][850/Hydt2}08' ][Dated ][10 ][07'2008 ][on ][the file]of the lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, Bench ]['A" ][Hyderabad' ][for the ][Assessment]Year 2004-05, [preferred against ][the ][order ][made ][in ][l.T ][A No'0352/DC-3(1yclT(A)-]lV/06-07 Daled [29.02-2008 ][on ][the ][file ][of ][the ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax'](Appeals)JV, [Hyderabad ][preferred against ][the ][Order made ][in ] No.AAFCST50IUSE-060, [Dated ][04 ][12'2006 ][on ][the ][file ][of ][Deputy Commissioner ][of]lncome Tax [Circle-3(1 ]), [Hyderabad')]
Between:A.C.Guards, [Masab ][Tank,]The Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax-lll, ][l'T ][Towers']Hyderabad....APPELLANT
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s Sentini [Technologies ][P\d. ][Ltd', ][1229' ][Road ][No ][60' ][Jubilee ][n"'t'.H83'F31rd#it]
Counsel for [the Appellant ][: SRI' ][J'V'PRASAD]S.C FOR INCOME
Counsel for [the Respondents: ]
The Court [made ][ihe ][following: ]
lr!l
ti
THE HON'BLETHE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENryAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAI No.284 of 2OlO
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'bte the Chief Justice Atok Arad.he)
Mr. J.V.prasad, rearned Senior Standing counsel Ibr Income TaxDepartment for the appellant.
2. karned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant seeks
leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal in the light of the CircularNo'o9/2024, dated 17.09.2024, with the liberty to revive the same incase the subject matter of the appeal fa_lls in any of the exceptionscase the subject matter of the appeal fa_lls in any of the exceptionsprovided in the Circular No.S/2024 dated 15.03.2024.
3.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the liberty as prayed for.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
sd/- K. sRrNrvASA BAOJOINT |REGIT}TRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,l. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench 'A', Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax, [(Appeals)-lV, ]Hyderabad
3. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle-3(1), Hyderabad
4. One CC to Sri J.V.Prasad, S.C for lncome Tax (OPUC)5. One CC to Sri Challa Nagendra Prasad, Advocate [(OPUC)]6. Two CD CopiesKs/gh5. One CC to Sri Challa Nagendra Prasad, Advocate [(OPUC)]6. Two CD CopiesKs/gh
Ks/ghu)
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011212024
JUDGMENT
I.T.T.A.No.284 ot 2010
asDismissing the Appeal Withdrawn. Without costs.
:D>CN
1\iL. [s ][-,r.,]Ito$,)zoo2ZiAll2[25o*t.-joA ! C
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.