Itta/285/2013 Of Ctr - Railone Jv v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iii
High Court
23 Jun 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/285/2013 Of Ctr - Railone Jv v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iii
Date of order
23 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itta/285/2013 Of Ctr - Railone Jv v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iii, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERBAD
MONDAY, THE TWENryIRD DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND ANTWENry FIVE
PRESET
THE HONOURABLE SRI JU TICE P.SAM KOSHYTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL AP EAL NO: 285 OF 2013
Appeal filed under Section 260-A ofe lncome Tax Act, [1 ]961 , aggrievedby the Orders dated 3'l .12.2012 of the [lnco]e Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench ['A',]Hyderabad passed in lTA.No,1 114lHYDl202, preferred against the order of theCommissioner of lncome Tax [(Appeals) ]-V, Hyderabad d1.21 .5. 2012 in ffA243llT06(3)icit9A)-iv/201 1-12 [for ]the assesment year 2009-10
Between:
CTR - RAILONE JV, G-3, 8-2-693/2to ['14, ]Road No.12, Banjarahills,Hyderbad - 500 034, Represented [b]its Authorised Signatory, Mr.K.KotiReddy, S/o Sesha Reddy.
...APPELLANT
AND
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [- ] , [Hyd]
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant : [SRI D.MANM]HAN REP BY SRI G V N HARICounsel for the Respondents: B. SAPNAEDDY, Standing CounselThe Court made the following:
.THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.285 OF 2013
JUDGMENTper tlte Hon ble Sn Justtce l'.San Koshyl
Heard Mr. Durrdu Manmohan, leamed counse[, reprcsenting Mr. G.V.N.Hari, learned counsel lor the appellant, and Ms. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, learnedSenior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department for the respondent.
2. Learned counsel fbr the appcllant submits that in view of the Income TaxTribunal Appeal No.496 of 201-i being allowed todal', vide order dated23.06.2025, he doc-s not intend to press the instant appeal any furlher-. l{e,therefore, pral,ed that the appeal may be disposed ofas "not pressed"
3. Recording the aforesaid subnrission made by the learned counsel lor theappellant, the instant appeal stands disposed ofas "not pressed".
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if an1,, shall stand closed.However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/- B. SATYAVATHIJOINT REGISTRAR
\r [l,]
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
t. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, [Bench ]['A', ][Hyderabad]
\
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (ppeals) - lV, Hyderabad3One CC to B. Sapna Reddy, Standingounsel, High Court, HYD. 4One CC to Sri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate IPUCIATwo CD Copies3One CC to B. Sapna Reddy, Standingounsel, High Court, HYD. 4One CC to Sri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate IPUCIATwo CD Copies
ABK
HIGH COURT
DATED:2310612025
II12 [r\JB ][10fi]i\i/t,'!.s -,.. ri:JUDGMENTITTA.No.285 of 2013
DISPOSING OF THE APPEALt(->.U\
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.