Case Law › High Court › Itta/286/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/286/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Fertilizers And Chemicals Ltd

High Court 23 Apr 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

23 Apr 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/286/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Fertilizers And Chemicals Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.286 of 2014 Date: 23-04-2014 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Hyderabad .....Appellant AND M/s Nagarjuna Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited, Hyderabad. . ...Respondent HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.286 of 2014 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) We have heard Mr.J.V.Prasad, learned Counsel for theappellant, and have gone through the judgment and order of thelearned Tribunal. The learned Tribunal has not decided anything on thequestion of law and has remanded the matter to the file of theAssessing Officer for fresh consideration. Hence, we do not findany reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the learnedTribunal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as tocosts. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall standclosed. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ __________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 23-04-2014 Gsn

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.