Case LawHigh Court › Itta/290/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/290/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Sri Gayatri Wines

High Court 11 Feb 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/290/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Sri Gayatri Wines
Date of order
11 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/290/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Sri Gayatri Wines, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed fordefault.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATEOF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENTTHE HON’BLE THECHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.290 of 2012 DATED: 11-02-2015 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-VI, Hyderabad .. Appellant And M/s. Sri Gayatri Wines .. Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.NO.290 OF 2012 ORDER:(per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) None appears. The appeal is accordingly dismissed fordefault. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed. No order as to costs. ______________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 11-02-2015 Svv (141) THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.290 OF 2012 _____________________________________________________ (Order of the Division Bench delivered by Hon’bleThe Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) 11-02-2015
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan