Itta/291/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri P.v. Ramana Reddy
High Court
06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/291/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri P.v. Ramana Reddy
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/291/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri P.v. Ramana Reddy, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: HIGH COURT DATED:06/01/202s JUDGMENT lTTA.No.291 ol 2012 APPEAL IS DISMISSED [AS WITHDRAWN.] v
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
t [34181]
oF rN [rHE ] [couRr ][FoRrEFfJtJt ]
*?$'"1";J["iff l'?${"f [iiiH0E']
PRESENT
USTICE THE ANDE J THE
291
UN [ APPE] [ NO:]INcoco [ TA]
INcocolncome [Tax ][Act' ][1961 against ][the]ApPeal [fi][led ][under Section 260-A ][of ][the]12011 [fot ][Assessment ][Year]Order [dated ][06]01 .2012 Passed [in ] [No' ][1][ 857/HYd]Bench-B, [HYderabad]llate [Tribunal']file [of the ][lncome ][Tax ][APPe]2005-06 [on ][the]the [Order ][dated ][22 ][09'2011][ passed ][in ][lT] [12llTO ][6(3yclT(A)-]IV,preferred [against]lV/2010-11 [on ][th][e ][file ][of ][the ][Commisstone][ r ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][(APPeals)]Order [dated ][28'122006 ][Passed][ ln]Hyderabad Preferred[against ][the ][Assessment]PAN/GIR [No.ADFPP][ 2181F ][on ][the ][file ][of ][the ][As][sistant Commissioner of lncome ][Tax']Central [Circle ]- [5, HYderabad]Between:
lT Towers, [A.C. Guards, ][HYderabad]Commissioner [of lncome ][Tax-lll]
...Appellant
AND
Sri P.V. Ramana [Reddy, Plot ][No ][28, ][Vivekananda Enclave' ][Road ][No' ][2' ][Banjara]Hills, Hyderabad
...Respondent
Counsel for the [APPellant]: Ms. B. Sapana [Reddy ][Junior ][Standing ][Counsel]representing [Mr. ][J.V. Prasad Senior Standing]Counsel for [lncome Tax DePartment]
Counsel for the [Respondent ][: ][Sri ] [Krishna ][Reddy]The Court delivered [the ][following:]
TEE I{oIv,TITEc?ICEKAAIYDN,BLEsJ.oMETRIBUNo.291ot2ol2
INcoME
JUDGM(td the Hon,bte the Chlef Justice Atok Aradhe)
Ms. B.Sapna
B.SapnaReddy, learnedJuniorStarrdingCounsel representingMr. J.V.prasad, learned SeniorStanding Counsel forIncome Tax Department for theappellant.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave o1. thisCourt to u,ithdraw the appeal in the light of the CircularNo.O9/2024, dated 17.09.2024, with the liberty to revivethe same in case the subject matter of the appeal falls inany of the exce,ptions provided in the Circular No.Sl2024dated 15.03.2024.
3. AccorclingJy, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the liberty as prayed for.
I(
Miscellaleous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/:K. SRITWASA RAoJNT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER
,)
1The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench_B, Hyderabad.
2The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) _ lV, Hyderabad.
JThe Assistant Commissioner of lncome iax, Centrat Circle _ 5,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.4One CC to One CC to Mr. J.V. prasad Senior Standing Counsel forSenior Standing Counsel forlncome Tax Department
One CC to SRI B KRTSHNA REDDY, Advocate
5.
6.Two CD Copies
DLigh
o-
\..
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/01/202s
JUDGMENT
lTTA.No.291 ol 2012
APPEAL IS DISMISSED [AS WITHDRAWN.]
v
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.