Itta/29/2009 Of Sri Gunupudi Venkataratnam v. The Income Tax Officer

«)|0OC/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI^^L^ MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH NUNEPALLY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 29 of 2009 Appeal under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ‘A’, Hyderabad dated24/10/2008 passed in I.T.A. No.123/Hyd./2002 for the[Assessment][ Year][ 1998-]1999preferredagainsttheorderoftheCommissionerofIncomeTax(Appeals), Guntur dated 10/12/2001 passedin ITA No.3/NLR/CIT(A)[/01-02]preferred against the order of the Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Nellore passedin PAN/GIR No. V-1200 dated 20/03/2001. Between: Sri Gunupudi Venkataratnam, Prop.Venkateswara Timber Co., 9/742, Santhapet, Nellore - 524 001.. ...APPELLANT AND’The Income Tax Officer,Ward-3, Nellore....RESPONDENTCounsel for the Appellant:SRI S. DWARAKANATH, REP. BYSRI K.P. AMARNATH REDDY.Counsel for the Respondent:SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA,(SC FOR INCOME TAX)The Court made the following JUDGEMENT: APHC010323072009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI[3464](Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 29/2009 Between; Sri Gunupudi Venkataratnam ...APPELLANT AND The Income Tax Officer ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant; 1.S DWARAKANATH Counsel for the Respondent; 1.VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA The Court made the following; A memodated22.01.2024wasfiledbythelearned counsel for the appellant. 2.SriK.P.Amarnath Reddy,learnedcounselfortheappellant submits that they have no further instructions[from]the legal representatives of the deceased inspite of[the][ fact][ that]appellant submits that they have no further instructions[from]the legal representatives of the deceased inspite of[the][ fact][ that] To registered letter has been sent which was returned[back][ as][ un] served with an endorsement “Addressee deceased”. 3.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed forwant of prosecution.want of prosecution. No order as to costs. Asasequelthereto,miscellaneouspetitions,ifanypending, shall also stand closed. SD/- S.V.S.R. MURTHYJOINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ‘A’, Hyderabad. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur, Guntur[District.] 3.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Nellore, SPSR Nellore[District.] 4.One CC to Sri S. Dwarakanath, Advocate, High Court[of] AP, Amaravati 5.One CC to Sri Vijay Kumar Punna, Standing Counsel for[Income][ Tax,] High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (OPUC) Three CD Copies 6. TAC HIGH COURT DATED:11/03/2024 ORDER- ITTA.No.29 of 2009 ;^^oF anoT:-reC3V■iO2 P A(jG 20?^rr:!'JX'■'■ferii c2c;i:.;<5:>• DISMISSING THE ITTAFOR WANT OF PROSECUTION ■N