Itta/292/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr. V. Satyanarayana Reddy
High Court
22 Mar 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/292/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr. V. Satyanarayana Reddy
Date of order
22 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itta/292/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr. V. Satyanarayana Reddy, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: Therefore, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and consequently, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
(On being mentioned)
Judgment:
Since the tax effect of the appeal is less than the ceiling limit prescribed under Circular No.21/2015, dated
10-12-2015, the case is not covered by the exceptions under
paras-5 and 8 of the said Circular. Therefore, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and consequently, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the questions of law are left unanswered. The miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending in this appeal shall stand closed. No costs.
22[nd] March, 2017. Ak
___________________________
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
________________
J.UMA DEVI, J.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
I.T.T.A.M.P.No.222 of 2007in/and
I.T.T.A.No.292 of 2006
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue