Itta/292/2013 Of The Citized Co-Operative Society Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/292/2013 Of The Citized Co-Operative Society Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/292/2013 Of The Citized Co-Operative Society Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Under the circumstances, we dismiss the appeal. ___________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.No.292 of 2013
DATED: 17.7.2013
Between:
The Citizen Cooperative Society Ltd., Hyderabad.
… Appellant
AndAssistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax,Circle-I,Hyderabad.
…. Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.No.292 OF 2013
Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and gonethrough the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal.
It appears, the learned Tribunal has rendered the impugneddecision while following its earlier decision in the assessee’s own casein respect of the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08 in I.T.A.No.1156 to 1159/Hyd/2009, dated 26.6.2010.
Similar issue was raised in those decided cases. Therefore, wedo not find any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order of the learnedTribunal.
However, it is pointed out orally by the learned counsel for theappellant that the earlier decisions of the Tribunal have been appealedagainst.
This point was not taken before the Tribunal nor any statementhas been made in the appeal papers that the earlier decisions areappealed against or the same have been upset by any forum.
Under the circumstances, we dismiss the appeal.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
G. ROHINI, J 17.07.2013
pnb
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.