Case LawHigh Court › Itta/299/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/299/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri P.v.ramana Reddy

High Court 06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/299/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri P.v.ramana Reddy
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/299/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri P.v.ramana Reddy, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordir-rgly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the liberty as [prayed ][for] t Miscellaneous applications pending, if arly, shall stald closed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 299 OF 2012 Appeal filed under Section 260-A oi the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against theOrder dated 06.01.2012 passed in l.T.A.No. 18551Hyd12011, for Assessment yearOrder dated 06.01.2012 passed in l.T.A.No. 18551Hyd12011, for Assessment year2002-03 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench-B, Hyderabadpreferred against the Order dated 22.09.2011 passed in lTA. No. 17llTO 6(3yCtT(A)-preferred against the Order dated 22.09.2011 passed in lTA. No. 17llTO 6(3yCtT(A)-lVl201O-11 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - lV,Hyderabad preferred against the Assessment Order dated 28J12.2006 passed inPAN/GIR No.ADFPP21B1F on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of lncomeTax, Central Circle -5, Hyderabad.Between:PAN/GIR No.ADFPP21B1F on the file of the Assistant Commissioner of lncomeTax, Central Circle -5, Hyderabad.Between: Commissioner of lncome Tax-lll, lT Towers, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad ..Appellant AND Sri P.V.Ramana Reddy, Plot No.28, Vivekananda Enclave, Road No.2, BanjaraHills, Hyderabad. ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Ms. B. Sapana Reddy Junior Standing Counselrepresenting Mr. J.V. Prasad Senior StandingCounsel for lncome Tax Department Counsel for the Respondent : Sri B. Krishna ReddyThe Court delivered the following: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEAND THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE J.SREENIVAS INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.299 of 2Ol2 JUDGMENT: ter [tlLe ][Hon'ble the ][Chrcf ][Justice ][Alok ][Aradhe)] Ms. B Sapna Reddy, learned Junior StandingCounsel representing Mr. J.V.Prasad, learrLed [Senior]Standing Co unsel for Income Tax Department for [the]appellant 2, Learned counsel for the appellant seeks loave of thisCourt to witlrclraw the appeal in the light of tl-re CircularNo.O9/2O2a, dated 17.09.2024, wrth the liberly to [revive]the same in [rlase ]the subject matter of the [appreal ][falls ][in]any of the exceptions provided in the Circular [No.5l2O24]dated 15.03.2',024. 3. Accordir-rgly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the liberty as [prayed ][for] t Miscellaneous applications pending, if arly, shall stald closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAOoT REGISTRARECTIOFFICER //TRUE COPY// \To, 1 Il" lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench-B, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - lV, Hyderabad. 3. The Assistant Commissioner 6f lncome Tax, Central Circle _5,l-,lyderabad.l-,lyderabad. 4. One CC to One CC to Mr. J.V. prasad Senior Standing Counsel forlncome Tax Department [OpUC]lncome Tax Department [OpUC]5One CC to SRl. B KRTSHNA REDDy Advocate [OpUC]fJ.Two CD CopiesfJ.Two CD Copies DUgh o \'.r:. HIGH COURT DATED:06/01/2025 JUDGMENTlTTA.No.299 ol 2012 APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN -KV iFrr'"':-_.=-r. \)t/,,\..\(''(O2c(.i1lttc.{+Io€5pq1g,rr(
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan