Itta/299/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi
High Court
21 Sep 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/299/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi
Date of order
21 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/299/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ]il any, in [this ][appeal ][shall ][also] stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTHONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
|.T.T.A. NO: 299 OF 2019
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B' ]Hyderabad in ITANo.1129/Hyd/2016, for assessment year 2009-2010 dated 31/10/2018 [preferred ]againstthe order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax [(Appeals) ]9, Hyderabad, Appeal No.lTANo.0391/DCIT dated 2910312016, preferred against the Order of the Dy. Commissionerof lncome Tax, Circle -2(3), Hyderabad PAN/GlR No. dated 3010612014
Between:
The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax-2, Hyderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi, Represented by legal heir - Sri. Gawa Amarender Reddy, 8-2-682, Laxmi, Road No. 12. Banjara Hills. Hyderabad [- ]600 034
..,RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : M/s K.MAMATA CHOUDARY, Advocate
For the Respondent : M/s DIWA DATLA, Advocate
The Court made the following: ORDER
To
HONOURABLE THE ACTING SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [T.VINOD ][KUM.A.R]
I.T.T.A. No. 299 OF 2019
JUDGMENT: [(Per ]Hon [ble ][The ][Acting Chief Justice ][Sri ][M.S.Ranachandra ][Rao)]
Letter dt. 20.09.2021 has been filed by [Ms. ][Mamta ][Chowdary,]learned counsel tbr the appellant, [seeking ][to ][withdraw this ][appeal ][in ][view]of the application filed by the [respondent under ][the ][Direct ]['lax ][Vivad ][se]Vishwas Act,2020, with tiberty to the appellant [to ][revive ][the ][appeal ][in ][the]event he does not get favourable relief under the [scheme ][provided ][under the]said Act.
2. Cranting liberty as sought, this ITTA is dismissed [as ][withdrarvn.]
3. Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ]il any, in [this ][appeal ][shall ][also]
stand dismissed. No costs.
Sdr-K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPYII
1The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [Bench-B, ][Hyderabad]
2The Commissioner of lncome Tax [(Appeals)-9, ]Hyderabad.
JThe Dy. Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-2(3), [Hyderabad.]4One CC to M/s K.Mamata Choudary, Advocate [(OPUC)]5One CC to M/s Divya Datla, Advocate [(OPUC)]oTwo CD Copies7One Spare Copy4One CC to M/s K.Mamata Choudary, Advocate [(OPUC)]5One CC to M/s Divya Datla, Advocate [(OPUC)]oTwo CD Copies7One Spare Copy
oTwo CD Copies7One Spare CopyK\.p7One Spare CopyK\.p
DAIED:2110912021
ORDERITTA.No.299 of 2019
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
\)a\,')P
.iAr€1qf,c,vj29 [sEP2021]*
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.