Itta/301/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Sri S.vijay Kumar
High Court
02 Dec 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/301/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Sri S.vijay Kumar
Date of order
02 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/301/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Sri S.vijay Kumar, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: As a subsidiary tothat, whether the piece or plate that is manufactured and supplied inthis regard shall be treated as separate unit, qualifying for 100%depreciation.
Decision: Following the same, we dismiss this writ appeal also.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A.No.301 of 2003
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy)
The question that arises for consideration in this appeal is asto whether the shuttering material used for providing support for RCCconstructions, qualifies for 100% depreciation. As a subsidiary tothat, whether the piece or plate that is manufactured and supplied inthis regard shall be treated as separate unit, qualifying for 100%depreciation.
Though the Assessing Authority took the view that thematerial in its entirety purchased by an assessee must be treated asa unit, the appellate authority took a different view and granted therelief. The department carried the matter in appeal and the samewas allowed.
Recently, we dealt with this question in detail inI.T.T.A.No.239 of 2003, preferred by the Revenue. Throughjudgment, dated 27.11.2014, we applied the theory of ‘irreducibleminimum’ in this behalf; took the view that each piece or plate wouldqualify for 100% depreciation, provided its cost is less thanRs.5,000/-, and dismissed the appeal.
Following the same, we dismiss this writ appeal also. Thereshall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions filed in this appeal shall alsostand disposed of.
Date:02.12.2014
GJ
____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
_____________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.