Itta/307/2014 Of The Commissionr Of Income-Tax-Iv v. M/S Liquidz India [P] Limited
High Court
05 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/307/2014 Of The Commissionr Of Income-Tax-Iv v. M/S Liquidz India [P] Limited
Date of order
05 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/307/2014 Of The Commissionr Of Income-Tax-Iv v. M/S Liquidz India [P] Limited, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. NO.307 OF 2014
DATED:5.6.2014
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax – IVHyderabad … Appellant
And
M/s. Liquidz India (P) Limited3-6-290, B-505, Sai Tirumala TowersHydergudaHyderabad … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. NO.307 OF 2014
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Sri J.V. Prasad, learned counsel appearing forthe appellant – Revenue, and gone through the impugned judgmentand order of the learned Tribunal.
The learned Tribunal, on the issue sought to be raised before us,found that pre-condition for imposition of penalty was not satisfied. That being a factual finding, we do not find any reason to interfere withthe impugned judgment.
The appeal is therefore dismissed. There will be no order as tocosts.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_______________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
5.6.2014
bnr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.