Itta/308/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Vemireddy Prabhakar Reddy
High Court
26 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/308/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Vemireddy Prabhakar Reddy
Date of order
26 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/308/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Vemireddy Prabhakar Reddy, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed[as]withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURPRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN
ANDHONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 308 OF 2012
Appealfiled under Section 260 Aof the Income TaxAct1961against the Order dated 26-12-2011passedinI.T.ANo.380/HYD/2011(Assessment year 2005-2006) by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal,Bench-B, Hyderabad, filed challenging the Order dated 20-12-2010passedin Appeal No.780/ACIT CC/TPT/CIT(A)-VII/10-11, by the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals)-VII, Hyderabad, filed against the Order dated 30-07-2010 passed U/s.143(3) read with Section 153A of the Income Tax Act,1961(Assessment year 2005-2006) by the Assistant CommissionerofIncome Tax, Central Circle, Tirupati, which was filed against the Orderdated06-02-2007passedU/s.143(3)oftheIncomeTaxAct,1961(Assessment year 2005-2006) by the Deputy CommissionerofIncomeTax, Circle-1, Nellore.
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkamal Complex, Lakshmipuram[Main]Road, Guntur-07.
...Appellant
Sri VemireddyPrabhakarReddy,16-3-805,SivakotareddyStreet,Ramamurthy Nagar, Nellore.
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant:Sri Anup Kaushik Karavadi
(Standing Counsel for Income Tax
Department)
Counsel for the Respondent
The Court made the followingiJUDGMENT
APHC010446202012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH0SS^rTO.rAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3516]
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 308/2012
Between;
Commissioner Of Income Tax,
...APPELLANT
AND
Sri Vemireddy Prabhakar Reddy
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.B NARASIMHA SARMA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
To
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellantseeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal as perthe Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024.
2.Permission is accorded.
3.Accordingly, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed[as]withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been[vacated.]withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been[vacated.]
As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending,if any, shallstand closed.
SD/-S.V.S.R. MURTHYJOINT REGISTRARC
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench-B, Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-VII, Hyderabad,
ofIncomeTax,CentralCircle3. TheAssistantCommissionerTirupati.Tirupati.
4. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1,Nellore.
5. Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkamal Complex, LakshmipuramMain Road, Guntur-07.Main Road, Guntur-07.
One CC to Sri Anup Kaushik Karavadi, Advocate [OPUC
6.
7. Three CD Copies
191
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
&
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
I.T.T.A.No.SOS of 2012
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
Date: 27.12.2024
MDP
HIGH COURT
DATED:27/12/2024
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.308 of 2012
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
BSV
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.