Case LawHigh Court › Itta/308/2019 Of The Principal Commissio...

Itta/308/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi

High Court 21 Sep 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/308/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi
Date of order
21 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/308/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTHONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR T.T.A. NO: 308 OF 2019 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section [260 ][of the ][lncome Tax Act, ][against]the order of the lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad in ] No.1 130/Hyd/2019 for assessment [year ][2O11-2012 ][daled ][3111o12o19 ][preferred ][against]the order of the commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals), ][Hyderabad, ][Appeal No. ] No.034B/DCIT daled 29103t2016, [preferred against ][the order ][of ][the ][Dy.commissioner]of tncome Tax circle 2(3) Hyderabad [PAN/GlR No. dated ][2610312013] Between: The Principal Commissioner [of lncome Tax-2, ][Hyderabad] AND Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi, [(Represented ][by ][legal ][heir ][- Sri. ][Gavva ][A]8-2-082, Laxmi, Road [No. ][12, ][Baniara ][Hills, ][Hyderabad ][- 600 034] ..,APPELLANTmarender Reddy),...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : M/s [K.MAMATA ][CHOUDARY, ][Advocate] For the Respondent : M/s [DATLA' ][Advocate] The Court made the following: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICESRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR I.T,T.A. No. 308 oF 2019 DCENT (Per Hon'ble The Acting Chiel Justice Sri M_s.Rtrmochandra Rar.t) Letter dt. 20.09.2021 has been filed by Ms. Marnta Chowdary,leamed counsel for the appellant, seeking to withdraw this appeal in viewof the application filed by the respondent under the Direct Tax Vivad seVishwas Act,2020, with liberty to the appellant to revive the appeal in theevent he does not get favourable reriefunder the scheme provided under thesaid Act. 2Granting liberty as sought, this ITTA is dismissed as withdrawn. 3Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this appeal shall alsostand dismissed. No costs. To .r,ltinffieis^rmR \SECTION OFFICER //'RUE copy, f Iffi [B:#H};"""']F;;E';tffi1'r-fiqffifi HIGH COURT DATED:21l09/2021 JUDGMENTITTA.No.308 of 2019 DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS. -iT4r6:oO04 [0[T2$21]!.u11:.f [l].1'lD14t
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan