Itta/308/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi
High Court
21 Sep 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/308/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi
Date of order
21 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/308/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTHONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
T.T.A. NO: 308 OF 2019
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section [260 ][of the ][lncome Tax Act, ][against]the order of the lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad in ] No.1 130/Hyd/2019 for assessment [year ][2O11-2012 ][daled ][3111o12o19 ][preferred ][against]the order of the commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals), ][Hyderabad, ][Appeal No. ] No.034B/DCIT daled 29103t2016, [preferred against ][the order ][of ][the ][Dy.commissioner]of tncome Tax circle 2(3) Hyderabad [PAN/GlR No. dated ][2610312013]
Between:
The Principal Commissioner [of lncome Tax-2, ][Hyderabad]
AND
Smt. Gavva Laxmi Devi, [(Represented ][by ][legal ][heir ][- Sri. ][Gavva ][A]8-2-082, Laxmi, Road [No. ][12, ][Baniara ][Hills, ][Hyderabad ][- 600 034]
..,APPELLANTmarender Reddy),...RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : M/s [K.MAMATA ][CHOUDARY, ][Advocate]
For the Respondent : M/s [DATLA' ][Advocate]
The Court made the following:
HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICESRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
I.T,T.A. No. 308 oF 2019
DCENT
(Per Hon'ble The Acting Chiel Justice Sri M_s.Rtrmochandra Rar.t)
Letter dt. 20.09.2021 has been filed by Ms. Marnta Chowdary,leamed counsel for the appellant, seeking to withdraw this appeal in viewof the application filed by the respondent under the Direct Tax Vivad seVishwas Act,2020, with liberty to the appellant to revive the appeal in theevent he does not get favourable reriefunder the scheme provided under thesaid Act.
2Granting liberty as sought, this ITTA is dismissed as withdrawn.
3Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this appeal shall alsostand dismissed. No costs.
To
.r,ltinffieis^rmR \SECTION OFFICER
//'RUE copy,
f Iffi [B:#H};"""']F;;E';tffi1'r-fiqffifi
HIGH COURT
DATED:21l09/2021
JUDGMENTITTA.No.308 of 2019
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS.
-iT4r6:oO04 [0[T2$21]!.u11:.f [l].1'lD14t
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.