Case LawHigh Court › Itta/309/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/309/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nirmala Homes Pvt Ltd

High Court 05 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/309/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nirmala Homes Pvt Ltd
Date of order
05 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/309/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nirmala Homes Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.309 OF 2014 DATED:5.6.2014 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-IVHyderabad … Appellant And M/s. Nirmala Homes Pvt. Ltd.,Flat No.3 & 4, PedsoPhase II ColonyYapralSecunderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.309 OF 2014 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We have heard Sri J.V. Prasad, learned Counsel for theappellant – Revenue and gone through the impugned judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal. The learned Tribunal has appreciated the fact in relation to theissue and passed the impugned judgment. Therefore, this Court is notin a position to reappreciate the fact. The appeal is therefore dismissed. There will be no order as tocosts. ________________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _______________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 5.6.2014 bnr
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan