Itta/311/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S. Andhra Pradesh Paper Mill

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD I.T.T.A.No.311 of 2005Date: 03.01.2018 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, …. Hyderabad. Appellant And M/s. Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills, 5[th] floor, Swapnalok Complex, S.D.Road, Secunderabad. … Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Mr.B.Narasimha Sarma Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Challa Gunaranjan The Court made the following: CVNR,J & TA, J I.T.T.A.No.311 of 2005 Date: 03.01.2018 Judgment : (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) The following substantial questions of law have been raised by the revenue in the present appeal: “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, whether, when the issue pertaining to the payment of deferential royalty payable to the government by the assessee is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the claim for total deduction of deferential royalty amount is sustainable in law? 2. Whether the finding of the Tribunal dismissing the appeal of the Revenue as a covered case and without considering the statutory provisions and the fact of pendency of related issue before the Hon’ble Supreme Court is sustainable in law? 3. Other ground if any would be urged at the time of hearing with the permission of the Hon’ble Court”. 2. At the hearing, Mr.B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax, fairly submitted that this Court by order dated 29.11.2017 has dismissed I.T.T.A.No.299 of 2005, relating to the same assessee, wherein identical questions of law have been raised by the revenue. 3. In the light of the said order, the substantial questions of law in this appeal are answered against the revenue and consequently, the appeal is dismissed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _____________________ (T.Amarnath Goud, J) CVNR,J & TA, J I.T.T.A.No.311 of 2005 Date: 03.01.2018