Case Law › High Court › Itta/31/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itta/31/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Ashok Kumar

High Court 21 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

21 Nov 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/31/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Ashok Kumar, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Following the same, we dismiss the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYAND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No. 31 OF 2004 21-11-2014 BETWEEN Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Hyderabad …Appellant And Ashok Kumar J. Bhupta (HUF), Hyderabad …..Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No. 31 OF 2004 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is filed against the order, dated 21-02-2003,passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘B’ of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal in ITA No.209/Hyd/2002. The learned counsel for the appellant and the learnedcounsel for the respondent submit that the subject matter of thisappeal is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court in ITTANos. 120, 132 and 229 of 2003, dated 16-09-2014. Following the same, we dismiss the appeal. There shall beno order as to costs. ___________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J 21-11-2014ks ____________________________CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.