Case Law › High Court › Itta/31/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Itta/31/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Handum Industries Limited

High Court 28 Apr 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

28 Apr 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/31/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Handum Industries Limited, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 679of 2014, 680 of 2014 and 681 of 2014, by common judgment dated 27.11.2014.Therefore, this appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.31 of 2015 DATED:28.04.2015 Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad. … AppellantAndM/s. Handum Industries Ltd.,Jinnaram Mandal,Medak District.….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.31 of 2015 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) On identical issue, this Court has dismissed appeals, being, I.T.T.A. Nos. 679of 2014, 680 of 2014 and 681 of 2014, by common judgment dated 27.11.2014.Therefore, this appeal is also dismissed. No costs. __________________K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ 28[th] April, 2015 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Pnb

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.