Case LawHigh Court › Itta/312/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/312/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax - V v. Sri. Y.venkateswarlu

High Court 14 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/312/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax - V v. Sri. Y.venkateswarlu
Date of order
14 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/312/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax - V v. Sri. Y.venkateswarlu, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Permission is accorded and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY I.T.T.A.No.312 of 2010 ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counsel for theIncome Tax Department, would submit that in terms of CBDT CircularNo.21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015, all appeals, where the tax effect is belowRs.20,00,000/-, are required to be withdrawn and, as the value of thepresent appeal is less than Rs.20,00,000/-, the appellant may bepermitted to withdraw the appeal. Permission is accorded and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed.There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 14[th] March, 2016Tsy ___________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan