Itta/314/2013 Of Vodafone Essar South Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
31 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/314/2013 Of Vodafone Essar South Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
31 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/314/2013 Of Vodafone Essar South Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, these appeals are also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANUI.T.T.A.Nos.313 and 314 of 2013
Date: 31-07-2013
I.T.T.A.No.313 of 2013:
Between:
M/s. Vodafone Essar South Ltd.(Presently M/s. Vodafone South Ltd.),1-10-178, Varun Towers-11, 6[th] Floor,Begumpet, Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
1.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 15(2), Hyderabad.Circle 15(2), Hyderabad.
… Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A.Nos.313 and 314 of 2013
COMMON ORDER:
(Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
On the identical facts and issues involved in case of anAppeal being I.T.T.A.No.291 of 2013 between M/s. Vodafone EssarSouth Ltd, Hyderabad and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Hyderabad, this Court was not inclined to admit the appeal anddismissed the same.
Accordingly, these appeals are also dismissed. There willbe no order as to costs.
_________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 31-07-2013YCR
_________________
K.C. BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.