Itta/315/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Mithra Agencies
High Court
03 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/315/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Mithra Agencies
Date of order
03 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/315/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Mithra Agencies, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANAND
HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS
I.T.T.A.No.315 of 2016
Judgment:
Since the tax effect of the appeal is less than the ceiling limitprescribed under Circular No.21/2015, dated 10-12-2015, and alsosince we have dismissed I.T.T.A.No.251 of 2016 by order dated 19-7-2016, rejecting the contention that the case would fall within the ambitof para 8(c) of the Circular, this appeal is also dismissed. Themiscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall standclosed. No costs.
___________________________
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
03[rd] August, 2016.Ak
___________________________
ANIS, J.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANANDHON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS
I.T.T.A.No.315 of 2016
03[rd] August, 2016.(Ak)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue