Itta/318/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Iii, Hyd v. M/S. Softpro System (P) Ltd., Hyd
High Court
20 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/318/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Iii, Hyd v. M/S. Softpro System (P) Ltd., Hyd
Date of order
20 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/318/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Iii, Hyd v. M/S. Softpro System (P) Ltd., Hyd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FORAr HYDr#lBltrE [oF ]
F R I DAY' r+r E rwE t. *II,'^IB'#.RiiF3 [X
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CTHE H O NO U RA B LE S R I }IE{::.J" -i::il: :,J rNcoME TAXTRIBUNAL APPAPP
=
TRIBUNAL APPAPPEAL NO:318 0F 2010
1961 against the rncome Tax Tribunal Appear Under order dared 2g-01-200, section *"'i,,. 260 A ofthe rncome Tax ActTribunat, Hyderabad Benches_ B "" "f [the ][rncorne ][Tax Appelrate]file Assessment of Commissioner year 1998_99 of lncome preferred Tax ,grin.t -(nppeafs)_fV, Hyd;;;;"'in.,.r.o.rou th"-O;er 'Hyderabad dated 28_10-2003 6,tHydt2002 on thetorin Appeal No.3:* ::#:1 3i fl lj?., [y",: ]Tit l,;'";,t":ru s,,he o rde r "f ,il. ;;p; ;
Between
+*,fffruitHrr [of ][lncome ][rax- ][ilt, ][Hyd ], [r.r ][rowers, ]A.c
Guards, Masab
AND
...Appellant
illt fffi?3l]ffi"9/rii',.f,I?+i3I", [soft ][ware ][rechnorosy ]park,
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appeltant: Sri J V prasad,Counsel for the Respondent :The Court delivered the following: JudgmentCounsel for the Respondent :The Court delivered the following: Judgment
SC for lncome Tax Department
KHETHEHON'BLETHEcF JUSTTCEANDRAoTHEHON'BLESRIJUSTICEJ.
No.318 of20LoINCOMETA)( T [ AP]
(Per the [Hon'ble ][tlo ][Chief Justice ][Alok ][Aradhe)]
MENT:
Mr. [J.V.prasad, Iearned ][senior standing counsel for ][Income ][Tax]Department [for ][the ][aPPellant']
Irarned [Senior Standing ][Counsel ][for ][the ][appellant ][seeks]
2.
leave [of ][this ][Court ][to ][withdraw ][the ][appeal ][in ][the ][light ][of ][the ][Circular]No.O9 l2O24,dated [17'09' ][2024' ][wrtr ][the ][liberty ][to ][rerrive ][the ][same ][in]case the [subject ][matter ][of ][the ][appeal ][fars ][in ][any ][of ][tJre exceptions]provided [in ][the ][Circular No'S/2024 ][dated ][15'O3'2024 ][']
3. Accordingly, [the ][appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn ][in ][terms]of the [tibertY ][as ]PraYed [for']
Miscellaneous [applications pending, ][if ][any, ][sha-ll ][stand ][closed']
However, [there shall ][be no][ order ][as ][to ][costs.]
sdld.V.S.S.C.S.M. JOINT REGISTRAR
/ITRUE COPY//
SECI'ON OFFICER
To,
iEkgi1p.:t#[*h:if ;il#*1,*ii,,id;'""'
HIGH
DATED:20 [11212024]
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.318 [of ][2010]
-::::l*,:--,/,.'..,.{ llt-: [.i1]4,.5rl r'lt [.1]'--ti;; 0ti JA}i [2025]zo,+*\{,\--rrtip,ii.C\1LD
DISMISSING WITHOUT
co\qabnYv_(\ilN
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.