Itta/321/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. Sri P.v. Ramana Reddy
High Court
06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/321/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. Sri P.v. Ramana Reddy
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/321/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. Sri P.v. Ramana Reddy, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the libe rty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
t [34181]
rN rHE [HrGH ][couRIfS$DrJkEAsBrl [oF ]
MoNDAY, [rHg ].q ][YTWO [r;*ffiiffi
PRESENT
THE N'BLETHEcHtEFJ lcEALOKARAD
AND
SREENIVASRAo,BLESRIJUSTI [ J.]THEHONINCoMETAXTRIBUAPPEAL[No:]321ot 2012
Section [260 ] [of ][the ][lncome Tax Act]lncome [Tax ][Tribunal ][APPeal ][Under]n the [file ][of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Appellate]1961 [against ][the ][order ][dated ][06-01-20'12 o]bad in [l.T ] [No ][1B54/Hyd/201 ][1 ][{or]Tribunal,Hyderabad [Bench ]['8" ][HYdera]nst the [Order ][daled ][22'09-2O1 ][1 ][on the]Assessment Year [2001-2002 ][Preferred agat]Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax ][(APPea ls)][-lV, ][HYderabad ][in APPeal ][No]file of [the]the [Order ][dated ][28-12-20OG]16/lT0 [6(3yclr(A)][ -M/2010-11 ][Preferred ][against]the Assistant [Commissioner ][of]passed [in ] [/ ][GlR ][No. ][on ][the file of]lncome-tax, [Centra] [Circle ][- ][5, HYderabad]
Between:
Commissioner [of ][lncome Tax ][lll][ lT ][Towers, ][A.C. ][Guards' ][HYderabad]
...APPellantSri P.V. [Ramana Reddy, ][PIot ][No ][28' Vivekananda Enclave' Road ][No'2' ][Banjara]''s.iliir., ii;;;ti ...Respondent
AND
Counsel for [the Appellant: ][Ms' ][B' ][Sapna ][Reddy'-standing ][Cornsel];.;r;;;;iid Mi. i.v. [pt"."a, ][standins counsel for ][lncome ][rax ][Department]Counsel forthe [Respondent: Sri ][B' Krishna ][Reddy]The Court delivered [the ][following: ]
THEHON'BLETHE CHIEF JUSTICEALOKDHEANDTHEHON 'BLESRI JUSTICEJ.SRAOINCOME TAX TRIBUNALAPPEALNo.327of2o72
JUDGMENT: 'Per the lton,ble the Chief Jushce Alok Aradhe)
Ms. B.Sapna
Ms. B.SapnaReddy, learned Junior StandingCounsel representingMr. J.V.prasad, learned SeniorStanding Cotrnsel forIncome Tax Department for theappellant.
2. Learnecl counsel for the appellant seeks leave oj- thisCourt to r.vithclrau, the appeai in the light of the Cirr:ularNo.O9/2024, dated. 12.09.2024, with the liberry to rt:vivethe same in case the subject matter of the appeal falls inany of the exceptions provided in the Circutar No.S/2O24dated 15.03.20114
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the libe rty as prayed for.
6
pending, [if ][anY']
shall
apPlicationsMiscellaneousstand [closed' ][However'][ there ][shall be no order ][as ][to ][costs]
sd/[. ][K. ] JOINT [GtST] OFFICE[R]S
/ITRUE [COPY"]
To,
1
2
3
4
5
6
The [lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal' Hyderabad ][Bench ]['8" ][Hyderabad']
The The [Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lV' Hyderabad'][[Circle ]][- ][5' ][Hyderabad']The [Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lV' Hyderabad'][[Circle ]][- ][5' ][Hyderabad']
The The [Assistant Commissioner of lncome-tax' Central ][[Circle ]][- ][5' ][Hyderabad'][[for ][lncome Tax ]][[lncome Tax ]][Department]The [Assistant Commissioner of lncome-tax' Central ][[Circle ]][- ][5' ][Hyderabad'][[for ][lncome Tax ]][[lncome Tax ]][Department]
The tt'"i'ng [Counsel ][[for ][lncome Tax ]][[lncome Tax ]][Department]tt'"i'ng [Counsel ][[for ][lncome Tax ]][[lncome Tax ]][Department]one [to ][Mr' ] ""t"i' ""t"i' toPUCl
On" [to Sri ] [Krishna Reddy' Advocate ]
Two [CoPies]
kam/gh
\cy
HIGH COURT
DATED:06 t}lt2OZs
JUDGIUIENT
lTTA.No.321 ot 2O1Z
THE APPEAL ISDISMISSED ASWTHDRAWN
qr{aX*.
T i-l(o((\c('t_)10 a[tUiJ*Cr*So4 16 s[C
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.