Itta/32/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. Detective Devices Pvt.ltd. Hyd
High Court
27 Aug 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/32/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. Detective Devices Pvt.ltd. Hyd
Date of order
27 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itta/32/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. Detective Devices Pvt.ltd. Hyd, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The miscellaneous petition filed in this appeal shallalso stand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDARAMI.T.T.A.No.32 of 2003
ORDER:(Per LNR,J)
In this appeal, the only question that arises forconsideration is as to whether the gas cylinders that arepurchased by the respondent must be treated asindividual units or they must be treated as part of a largerunit in the context of allowing depreciation.
In common order, dated 23.07.2014 passed by us inI.T.T.A.Nos.8 and 44 of 2002, we took the view that thecylinders must be treated as individual units and thatsince the value of cost of each cylinder is less thanRs.5,000/-, the depreciation to the extent of entire cost must be allowed.
Following the same, we dismiss the appeal.
The miscellaneous petition filed in this appeal shallalso stand disposed of. There shall be no order as tocosts.
______________________
L.NARASIMHA
REDDY, J
27.08.2014JSU
______________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDARAM
I.T.T.A.No.32 of 2003
JSU
Date: 27.08.2014
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.