Itta/33/2011 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/33/2011 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/33/2011 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH
THURSDAY, [TWELFTHDAYrcF ] TwoTHCi#'tN' [oNo ][TwENTY FlvE]
PRESENT
THE [P'SAM ] ANDrHE HoNouRABLE'o' [J""ti ][Koot'*" ][RAo ][NANDIK.NDA]
eal N[o.33 o]f2011,Inco[meT][ax ][Tr][ibuna][1A]
Income [Tax ][Tribunal ][Appeal ][Under ][Sectio ][n ][260 ][of ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Act']against [the order ][of ][the lncome ][Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench ]["B"']Hyderabad [in ][ITA No ][718 ][lHyD/[OO5for ][the ][assessment ][years ][1999-2000 ][to ][2001-]2002 dated [24'04 ][z[Ogpreferred against the ][Order of ][the ][Commissioner ][of ][Income]&Tax (Appeais-Ill), [Hyderabad' ][Appeal No'232' 233 ]B4 / [DCTTIO)HYD/ ][CIT(A)III/ ][04-05 ][dated ][31'03'2005']
1-10-1.40 I [1,, ][GurukruPa' Ashok Nagar']?:fl:til [Cement ][sugar ][and ][Industries ][Ltd']..APPellant.Hyderabad [- ][500 ][020']
AND
Circle-2 [1], [8tr' ][Floor, ] [Towers' ][AC Guards']DeouW [Commissioner of ][Income ][Tax']..ResPondentHyherauaa.
Counsel [for ][the ][Appellant: ][Sri ] [V'Narasimham']
Counsel for [the Respondent: Sri ][P'Murali ][Krishna']
The Court [made the ][following: ]
THEHON[,BLE]SRICEP.SAMKOSHYANDTHEHON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSINGRAOITANDIKONDAINCOMETRIB
No.330F 20tt
MENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice p.Srrm Kosh.A)
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counselfor the appe'ant submits that the apperant has settled the disputewith the department under the Vivad Se vishwass scheme and henceprays for withdrawal of the instant appeal.2. As prayed for,the present appeal stands dismissedaswithdrawn.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any,
if any,shallstand closed.
SD/- MOHD.ISMAILDEPUTY REGISTRARDEPUTY REGISTRAR
r{fSECTION OFFICER
//TRUECOPY/ /
To,
1 Il" [Il.o-g ][Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ][Bench,,B,,, ][Hyderabad]2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeats-Ill), Hyderabad [']2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeats-Ill), Hyderabad [']
3. One CC to Sri C.V.Narasimham, Advocate tOirUC]tOirUC]
4. One CC to Sri P.Murali Krishna, Advocate
5. Two CD Copies.
JCK/I'SL(A-
HIGHCOURT
DATED:L2/06/2025
JUDGMENTITTA.No.33 of 2O7t
Dismissing the I.T.T.A. as withdrawan(t-T)-\&s
oR1H€ Sr;e,6t<l:'-)t a')10 i'UE (-MtS,' ^ rr.\'.:-:__:-:z/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.