Itta/334/2011 Of Adp Private Limited, Hyderabad v. Thedeputy Commisisoner Of Income Tax, Circle 1 [1] , Hyderab
High Court
22 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/334/2011 Of Adp Private Limited, Hyderabad v. Thedeputy Commisisoner Of Income Tax, Circle 1 [1] , Hyderab
Date of order
22 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/334/2011 Of Adp Private Limited, Hyderabad v. Thedeputy Commisisoner Of Income Tax, Circle 1 [1] , Hyderab, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
|.T.T.A. NO: 334OF 2011
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B' Hyderabad in ITANo.106/Hyd/2009 for assessment year 2004-2005 daled 251021201 1 preferred againstthe order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lll, Hyderabad, AppealNo.0061/ClT(A)-lll/08-09 dated 1811112008 preferred against the Order of the lncomeTax Officer, Ward 1(2) PAN/GlR No.AAACW 2655C/A 447 daled 1811212006.
Between:
ADP PRIVATE LIMITED, 6-3-1091/C/1, Fortune 9, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
THE DEPUTY COMMTSTSONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1 [1], HYDERABAD.
,..RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : SRI K.RAJI REDDY, AdvocateFor the Respondent :
The Court made the following: ORDER
IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ANDHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
ITTA.No.334 of 2O11
JUDGMEN T: (Per Si Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao)
Counselfor the appellant has filed a Memodt.O9.O4.2O2l seeking permission of the Court towithdraw the appeal to settle the matter with theauthorities under Vivaad Se Vishwas Act,2O2O.dt.O9.O4.2O2l seeking permission of the Court towithdraw the appeal to settle the matter with theauthorities under Vivaad Se Vishwas Act,2O2O.
2Granting permission as sought for, this Appeal isdismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
3Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, ifany, shall stand closed.petitions pending, ifany, shall stand closed.
Sd/-K.SREENIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR@SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPYII
To1.The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyd_erabad [,8, ]Bench, Hyderabad.2.9n" 99 [to ][Sri K.Raji ][Reddy, ][Advocatdiopucf ][- ][-"]3.Two CD Copies [']Kj
HIGH COURTDATED:2210412021
ORDERITTA.No.334 ol 2011
DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN THE ITTA.
t1/L)fri4q)
1[t't] [sTArF]/<I ,j01JllN [20?1]a\e-a'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.