Case Law › High Court › Itta/336/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/336/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. M/S L And T Infocity Ltd

High Court 20 Aug 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

20 Aug 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/336/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. M/S L And T Infocity Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU I.T.T.A.No.336 of 2013 Date: 20.08.2013 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad. .....Appellant AND M/s L & T Infocity Ltd.,Secunderabad.. ...Respondent HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU I.T.T.A.No.336 of 2013 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) We have heard Sri J.V.Prasad, learned Counsel for theappellant, and gone through the judgment and order of the learnedTribunal. We are of the view that the learned Tribunal has correctlyremanded the matter for fresh decision. Therefore, we do not findany reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the Tribunal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _______________ K.C.BHANU, J 20.08.2013 Gsn

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.