Itta/338/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.krishna District Co Operative Central Bank Limited
High Court
19 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/338/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.krishna District Co Operative Central Bank Limited
Date of order
19 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/338/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.krishna District Co Operative Central Bank Limited, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn,Nocosts.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
oA.Irv-^',34f7IF'JV1?7of?
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No- 338 OF 2Q1«
Between;
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada
AND
...APPELLANT
M/s.Krishna District co operative Central Bank Limited11/717,Jagannathapuram, machilipatnam
...RESPONDENT
Appeal under section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961, againstorder of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal,VisakhapatnamBench,Visakhapatnam,inITA.No.120A/izag,2013dated08.11.2017forAssessment Year 2007-08.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. J.V. PRASAD (SC FOR INCOMETAX)
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI. DUNDU MANMOHANThe Court delivered the following Judgment:
APHC010192582018IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRAPRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3507]
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHARINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.338 OF 2018
Between:The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s Krishna District Co Operative Central Bank ...RESPONDENTLimited
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. J V PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.DUNDUMANMOHAN
2.VENKATRAM REDDY MANTUR
The Court made the following:
jypGMENI:- (per Hon'ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
1.
1.The learned counsel for the appellant-Departmenthas fileda memo into Court, including acopy of the circular whereby, theappellant-Department has formulateda litigation policy and underthe said policy,it has beenresolved not to initiate any appealsorpetitions, where themonetary stakes involvedarelessthanRs.2 Crores and hencehe prays leave of the Court to withdrawthe appeal.a memo into Court, including acopy of the circular whereby, theappellant-Department has formulateda litigation policy and underthe said policy,it has beenresolved not to initiate any appealsorpetitions, where themonetary stakes involvedarelessthanRs.2 Crores and hencehe prays leave of the Court to withdrawthe appeal.
2.Submission is placed on record.
3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn,Nocosts.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneouspetitions, if anypending in this appeal shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SOI- P VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRAR
To
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench,
Visakhapatnam.
2. One CC to Sri J.V. Prasad, SC for Income Tax
3. One CC to Sri Dundu Manmohan, Advocate
4. Three CD Copies
GLM
vna
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/11/2024
JUDGMENT:
ITTA.No.338 of 2018
DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWN
X0 5 MAR 2025j||. current Section ^
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.