Case LawHigh Court › Itta/34/2011 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar An...

Itta/34/2011 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 12 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/34/2011 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/34/2011 Of Kakatiya Cement Sugar And Industries Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: As prayed for,withdrawn. the present appeal stands dismissed as As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shail stand closed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

oF TELANGANA rN rHE [H|GH ]"o,TfSIotJ*=ott#E TH U RSDAY,TH [DAY-gF--J ][yi! ][E]rWO THOUSAND PRESENT THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE P'SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HoNouRABLE [sRl ][uusri6e ][r'ranslNc ][RAo ][NANDIKoNDA] tNcoMET [ NO:34][ o] [2011] lncome [Tax ][Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-A ][of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act'1961]aoainst the [order ][dated ][#fi:iililas-sed ][in.lrA ][No'717/HYD/2005 ][for ][the]Aisessment [Year ][2000-20'01 ][;-th" ][ri-re ][ot ][tne ][lncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal']UyaeraOaa [Bench'B', ][HYderabad'] Between: Ltd., [1-10-14011 ][GurukruPa']Kakativa Cement [Sugar ][& ][lndustries]nsfrof<'f.f [aSar, ][HYderabad 500020]...APPELLANT ...APPELLANT AND Deoutv Commissioner [of lncome ][Tax' ][Circle ][-2('1) ][8th ][Floor lncome Tax]i"*"t'., [A.C.Guards, ][Hyderabad ]...RES'.NDENT Counsel [for the Appellant: ][SRI' ] Counsel [for the ][ResPondent:] The Court [delivered the ][following: ] THE IIoN'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOMETAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.34 0F 2011 JUDGMENT: (per Hoft'ble Si Justice p.Sam Koshg) Today, when the matter is taten up for hearing, learned counselfor the appe,a,t submits'that the appelrant has settred the disputewith the department under the vivad Se vishwass Scheme and henceprays for withdrawal of the instant appeal. 2. As prayed for,withdrawn. the present appeal stands dismissed as As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shail stand closed. SD/. M. RAMANA KRISHNA JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To, t/ 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad 2. One CC to SRl. C V NARASIMHAM Advocate 3. Two CD Copies PM/gh (( HIGH COURT DATED:12 tO6tZO2S ORDER lTTA.No.34 ot 2011 DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWN 6coQ(e}V\-t"1E' ,i.i21 [rlJBM]*{'Dt.sn^1c\re9 i
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan