Itta/34/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Sanghi Spinners India Ltd
High Court
19 Mar 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/34/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Sanghi Spinners India Ltd
Date of order
19 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itta/34/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Sanghi Spinners India Ltd, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.34 OF 2014
DATED: 19.03.2014
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-III,IT Towers, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad.
… Appellant
and
M/s.Sanghi Spinners India Limited,4-3-352, Bank Street, Hyderabad.
… Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.34of2014
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Mr. B.Narasimha Sarma, learnedcounsel for the appellant and Mr. Y.Ratnakar, learnedcounsel for the respondent and gone through the impugnedorder.
We have noticed that there is a typographical mistakeas the learned Tribunal records Section 115JB of theIncome Tax Act, but it should be explanation (iii) of Section115JB(2) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, paragraph 5 ofthe impugned order should be read with the explanation (iii)as available under Section 115JB(2).
Except the aforesaid correction, we do not find anyreason to interfere with the impugned order.
Hence, we dispose of the appeal without admitting thesame. There will be no order as to costs.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
19[th] MARCH, 2014.
__________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
bnr/kvni
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.