Itta/342/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Agrilcultural Market Committee, Anakapalli
High Court
18 Oct 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/342/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Agrilcultural Market Committee, Anakapalli
Date of order
18 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/342/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Agrilcultural Market Committee, Anakapalli, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The Assessment Order dated 24-12-2009 of the IncomeTax Officer, Ward I, Anakapalli is upheld accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEGODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN. RAVI SHANKAR
ITTA No. 342 of 2011
Dated: 18-10-2011
Between
Commissioner of Income Tax-IVisakhapatnam
And
Agricultural Market Committee,Anakapalli
…Petitioner
…Respondent
Oral Order:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
It is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant-Revenue that in view of the judgment of this Court dated 303-2011 inITTA No. 421 of 2010 and batch, this appeal requires to be allowed,since the STAT, Visakhapatnam Bench erred in concurring with theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who held that Section10(26AAB) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is retroactive in operation andthereby the income of the respondent-assessee is exempt under thesaid provision. This Court in the judgment referred to has held that theprovision of Section 10 (26AAB) of the Act is prospective in operation.
Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The order of STAT,Visakhapatnam Bench dated 3-8-2010 in ITA No.312/Vizag/2010confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)dated 30-3-2010 who set aside the orders of the Assessing Authority,is set aside. The Assessment Order dated 24-12-2009 of the IncomeTax Officer, Ward I, Anakapalli is upheld accordingly. No costs.
______________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
18[th] October, 2011
GRR
______________________
N. RAVI SHANKAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.