Itta/344/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv v. M/S Ushodaya Enterprises P Ltd
High Court
11 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/344/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv v. M/S Ushodaya Enterprises P Ltd
Date of order
11 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/344/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv v. M/S Ushodaya Enterprises P Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.344 of 2014
DATED:11.6.2014
Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax (IV),Hyderabad.And M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
….Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 344 of 2014
Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta)
We have heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for theappellant and we have gone through the impugned judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal.
It appears that the learned Tribunal while deciding the issuehas relied on the Special Bench Judgment of the Tribunal ofKolkata Bench. It is not submitted before us that the aforesaidjudgment has been impugned or reversed. Hence, we do not findany element of law involved in this appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR,
J
11[th] June, 2014
PNB
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.