Itta/344/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K V S Prakasa Rao
High Court
19 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/344/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K V S Prakasa Rao
Date of order
19 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/344/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K V S Prakasa Rao, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
s.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURPRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARANDHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.344 of 2018
Appeal under Section 260 A of Income Tax Act, aggrieved by theorder dated 18-8-2017 in I.T.A.No.488A/izag/2013 (Assessment year 2005-06) before theHon'ble Income Tax AppellateTribunal, VisakhapatnamBench,atVisakhapatnamandpreferredagainsttheorderoftheCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada, dated[29.04.2013]bearing AppealNo.430/CIT(A)/VJA/10-11 and preferred against the orderoftheIncome-TaxOfficer,Ward-2(1),VijayawadainPAN/GIR.No.AFWPK8823N/A.Y.2005-06/ITO/WARD-2(1)/Vijayawadadated 31.12.2010.
Between:
The Principal Commissioner of income- Tax, Vijayawada.
...Appellant/ Appellant
AND
K V S Prakasa Rao, LR of Late Smt.K. Suseela, Door No. 29-14-53Surya Rao Pet, Vijayawada.
...Respondent/ Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri J V Prasad (SC for Income Tax)
Counsel for the Respondent: M/s. CKR AssociatesThe Court made the following: ORDER
%
APHC010023302018IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRAPRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3507]
TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHARINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 344/2018
Between:
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-tax.
...APPELLANT
AND
K V S Prakasa Rao...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. J V PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.CKR ASSOCIATES
To
TK
vna
The Court made the following: (per Hon ble Sri Justice G Narendar)
The learned counsel for the appellant-Department has[filed]a memo into Court, including a copy of the circular whereby, theappellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy[and][ under]the said policy,it has been resolved not to initiate any appeals orpetitions, where the monetary stakes involved arelessthanRs.2 Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court to withdrawthe appeal.
2.Submission is placed on record.
3.Accordingly,the appealis dismissed as withdrawn.Nocosts.costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending in this appeal shall stand closed.
i\SD/- P VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam[Bench,][ at]Visakhapatnam.Visakhapatnam.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada,[Krishna]District.District.
3. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Vijayawada, Krishna[District.]
4. One CC to Sri J V Prasad (SC for Income Tax)
5. One CC to M/s. CKR Associates, Advocate
6. Three CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/11/2024
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.344 of 2018
fe2 8 FEB 2125Current Section
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.