Case Law › High Court › Itta/345/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/345/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax [Central] v. S Ivrcl Infrastructure And Project Ltd

High Court 11 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

11 Jun 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/345/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax [Central] v. S Ivrcl Infrastructure And Project Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, this appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.345 of 2014 DATED:11.6.2014 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),Hyderabad.And M/s. IVRCL Infrastructure & Project Ltd.Hyderabad. … Appellant ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 345 of 2014 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta) The Tribunal has followed its own judgment, by which,identical issue has been decided against the Revenue. Hence, this appeal is also dismissed. Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 11[th] June, 2014 PNB

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.